Appendix 2- Table Outlining Recommendations

The below table shows a summary of the amount of objections for each cycle hangar location noted in point 2 of the main report, and reasons residents gave, along with officer recommendations

Road Name	Specific location	Ward	Amount of requests from 2021 survey	Amount of Objections/support during TRO	Summary of reasons	Officer recommendation
Burton Villas	Outside 40 Wilbury Crescent	Goldsmid	12 on Wilbury Crescent	13 residents objected 1 ward Cllr objected	· Positioning of the hangar, should be placed away from anyone’s front door. · Taking away a parking space. · Lack of parking enforcement in the area · Burton Villas is mainly houses, not flats · More suitable locations on Wilbury Crescent or Bigwood Avenue suggested	Officers considered the objections and in this case recommend seeking an alternative site for the hangar.
Franklin Street (hangar 1)	Outside 45	Hanover & Elm Grove	16	2 objections from residents, 1 official complaint from resident of Franklin Street	· Anti social behaviour · Turning circle for vehicles · Access to the park · Proximity to residents window	On further investigation officers agree that this is not a suitable location for a hangar, recommend that we don’t install it. Hangar 2 is already installed on Franklin St.
Cissbury Road (hangar 2)	Outside 32, near junction with Old Shoreham Road	Goldsmid	11	7 objections from residents 2 objections from ward Cllrs 2 support from residents	· Loss of parking · No need for 2 hangars · Graffiti concerns	Objections have been considered and recommend the location is suitable. Install it.
Road Name	Specific location	Ward	Amount of requests from 2021 survey	Amount of Objections/support during TRO	Summary of reasons	Officer recommendation
Dudley Road	Hangar 1 – Next to disabled bay near junction with Hollingbury Place Hangar 2 – Outside number 5	Hollingdean	8	25 objections from residents 7 support from residents	· Loss of parking · Not needed as there’s mainly houses on Dudley Rd, not flats. Some have garages for bike storage · Anti-social behaviour issues · They would cause disturbance/noise for residents · Shouldn’t be installed directly outside properties	Objections have been considered and in this case recommend seeking an alternative site for both hangars. Not on Dudley Road.
St Leonards Road	Hangar 1 – Outside number 111 Hangar 2 – outside number 20	Wish	7	6 objections from residents 1 support from resident in St Leonards Rd & 1 from resident in St Leonards Ave	· Loss of parking · Not needed as the road has mainly houses with gardens/side access, not many flats on the road · Other roads and areas close by are more suitable for cycle hangars · Anti social behaviour concerns	Objections have been considered and in this case recommend installing both hangars.
Clermont Terrace	Hangar 1 – outside number 39 Hangar 2-outside Clermont Church	Withdean	11	6 objections from residents 2 support from residents	· Safety concerns (hangar 2) · Pleasant looking tree lined street – hangars look unattractive · Unsuitable location, other areas nearby would be better · Not needed · Loss of parking	Objections have been considered and recommend the location is suitable. Install both hangars, with an amendment to hangar 2 to address the safety issue.
Road Name	Specific location	Ward	Amount of requests from 2021 survey	Amount of Objections/support during TRO	Summary of reasons	Officer recommendation
Kingsley Road	Hangar 1 – outside number 4 Hangar 2 – outside number 31	Withdean	15	6 objections from residents	· Loss of parking · Mainly houses not flats on the road · Other locations in the area more suitable · Noise · Residents can keep bikes on railings in their gardens	Objections have been considered and recommend the location is suitable. Install both hangars.
Islingword Place	Hangar 1 – outside number 2 Hangar 2 – outside number 44	Hanover & Elm Grove	6	6 objections from residents 2 support from residents	· Noise and disturbance to residents · Won’t discourage driving · Blocks doorway access · Prevents residents from parking close to their homes · Elderly/disabled resident concerns (hangar 2)	Install Hangar 1 only. Gradient is an issue for installing hangars on this road.
Chesham Street	Hangar 2 -outside number 3 (hangar 1 not proposed as yet)	East Brighton	9	6 objections from residents 1 support from a resident	· Loss of parking, recent EV bay already took 2 resident permit holder bays · Road safety, proximity to junction · Not an appropriate location · Most residents have cycle storage in their properties	Objections have been considered and recommend the location is suitable. Install this one.
The Drive – hangar 1	Outside Home Drive House	Central Hove & Goldsmid	8	Petition from 20 residents of a block of flats near the proposed location. 2 other resident objections	· Hangars not needed at this location · Loss of parking · Outside a retirement block and no one there cycles	Don’t install, 1 other on The Drive is already installed, another will be proposed in the next round of TRO advertisements.